Europe is the region of the world where government
expenditure represents the largest share of GDP
– roughly 46%. This is largely because Europe is
home to the most comprehensive and developed
social safety nets in the world. In fact, over
70% of government expenditure in the EU is linked
to citizens’ wellbeing, whether in the form of social
protection, health, housing or education. Thanks to
these high levels of social protection, Europeans have
generally been better sheltered from recent increases
in inequality that have affected other developed
and emerging economies, threatening their internal
cohesion.
Importantly, the EU and its Member States have
managed to maintain these high levels of government
spending, while at the same time significantly
improving their fiscal sustainability. In 2017, the EU’s
public deficit amounted to just one fifth of that
of the US, and one quarter of that of Japan. Public
debt in the EU is also considerably lower than in the
US, standing at 83% of its GDP in 2017, compared to
108% in the US, and as much as 240% in Japan.
Nonetheless, interest payments on public debt
stock still represent a meaningful – albeit
limited – share of EU governments’ expenditure.
While accounting for a moderate 2.2% of GDP on
average, they vary significantly, from 0.2% of GDP
in Estonia to 4.3% in Portugal. And, even though no
EU Member State currently faces short-term fiscal
sustainability risks, the medium- to longer-term fiscal
implications resulting from the end of accommodative
monetary policies, and, more importantly, from an
ageing population and a shrinking workforce, will
present challenges for as many as half of the EU’s
Member States.1
There is increasing consensus that, in a rapidly
changing world, government expenditure – including
social expenditure – needs to be oriented ever more
towards investing in the future, to enable citizens and
economies to better face the challenges ahead. In the
EU, only a handful of Member States are really
thinking long-term when setting their public
investment priorities. Countries like Denmark and
Sweden, for instance, currently allocate 6.9% and
6.6% of their GDP respectively on education, as well as
2.2% and 1.8% on R&D – far more than many of their
counterparts.
Naturally, government finances are not just a question
of deficits and surpluses, or of where one spends ones
money – but also one of quality. How governments
spend their resources matters. Experience in the
EU Member States shows that very different levels
of social protection spending can in fact achieve
similar outcomes. Vice versa, similar levels of
spending can also result in very different outcomes.
The following overview of government expenditure by
function across Member States nevertheless suggests
that there is a significant margin for improvement
in the way that the EU and its Member States use
their fiscal resources. Without compromising on the
wellbeing and protection of citizens, more (and better)
resources should be targeted towards future-oriented
areas like innovation, research, education, training and
defence.
European Political Strategy Centre
https://ec.europa.eu/epsc/sites/epsc/files/epsc_-_where_eu_governments_spend.pdf
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario